Philosophy 1490: Requirements

Course Structure

The main course meetings will be Monday, Wednesday, and Friday at 1pm, in Sayles 306. So far as possible, the course will be conducted as a discussion, not a lecture. Students should arrive for each class appropriately prepared: not just having read the material for that class, but with questions about it, comments on it, and criticisms of it.

We will generally discuss one paper each meeting. Reading notes will be posted to the course website to help guide students through the reading, together with some questions worth considering as you read. These are, essentially, the notes I'd use if I were going to lecture.

Each student is required to post a 'response' to the reading to the course's Canvas site by no later than 9am the day we will be discussing it (except on days when papers are due). This is to give everyone, especially me, time to read and digest the responses. Students are (not specifically required but are) encouraged to read each other's postings, to comment upon them, and generally to use Canvas a platform for discussing the readings and asking questions.

Students do not need to answer any (let alone all) of the questions raised in the reading notes in their 'responses'. What I am really interested to know is which parts of the articles students felt they understood, which they felt they did not, and what questions they have about the readings, so I can structure our discussion appropriately.

Requirements and Grading Policies

Grades for the course will be determined as follows.

If they wish to do so, graduate students are welcome to write a single 'seminar paper' instead of writing the shorter ones. This should be discussed with the instructor.

Grades will be recorded on the course's Canvas site. Pay no attention to Canvas's report of your cumulative grade. It is useless.

Warning: I do not accept late work, under any circumstances. On the other hand, I am extremely flexible about due dates. That is to say: If someone should need an extra day or two, they need only ask; no reason even need be given. If someone should need more time than that, then some reason does need to be given, but the request will usually be granted. Since I am so flexible, there can be no excuse for one's not asking for an extension. It's really just a matter of respect.

Guidelines for Reading and Writing Philosophy Papers

Jim Pryor, a friend and former colleague who is now at NYU, has written two pieces that address the questions how to read philosophy papers and how to write philosophy papers. You may find them here:

If you are new (or newish) to philosophy, then they are very highly recommended. And, even if you are an old hand, you are sure to find something of value in what Jim has to say.

Time Expectations

You should thus expect your total time commitment for this class to be about 180 hours.

In Class Behavior

Most people find it dificult to grasp that whatever they like to do sexually will be thoroughly repulsive to someone else, and that whatever repels them sexually will be the most treasured delight of someone, somewhere. One need not like or perform a particular sex act in order to recognize that someone else will, and that this difference does not indicate a lack of good taste, mental health, or intelligence in either party. (Gayle Rubin, "Thinking Sex")

Much of the material we will be discussing is `academic' and relatively `dry'.1 But some of it may be emotionally challenging, and any discussion about sexuality has the potential to feel threatening. It will therefore be essential that there be an atmosphere of trust and safety in the classroom. I will attempt to foster an environment in which each member of the course is able to speak freely, and to be heard respectfully, and I will demand that all members of the course show proper respect for one another's views, attitudes, opinions, and feelings. Some of the material we discuss may evoke strong reactions. Please be patient and kind with one another, and do not jump to conclusions. Do not make sweeping generalizations (anyone who finds that erotic must be sick) but use "I" language (that makes me feel uncomfortable). Expect the best, not the worst, of others. Still, as good as our intentions may be, there may be occasions when someone says or does something that causes discomfort or offense, and such episodes can adversely affect other people's educational experience. I will make it my responsibility to address such issues forthrightly.

Any student who fails to meet these standards will be given one opportunity to correct their behavior. Failure to do so will result in exclusion from the course. Please remember, too, that Brown's Title IX policy applies to all of us.

Should any issues of this sort arise, students will have four options open to them:

  1. Discuss the situation with the class. Other students may well have had a similar reaction, and discussing our reactions will allow everyone in the class to have a fuller understanding of the context and impact of the material we are studying.
  2. Discuss the situation privately with me, and I will address the matter with others if need be. Such conversations will remain confidential.
  3. Use the anonymous `course feedback' form that will be made available on a weekly basis.
  4. If for any reason someone does not feel comfortable discussing the issue with me, they are encouraged to speak to someone else, such as an academic advisor, a trusted faculty member, or a friend, and have them talk to me.

Electronic Devices

Students may use laptops and the like to take notes in class or to access material we are discussing in class, but all other use of computers, tablets, and mobile devices is strictly prohibited during class. This includes but is not limited to checking email, texting, and searching the web, even if the search is related to the course (unless special permission has been given). I establish this rule not for my benefit, not even for yours, but rather for that of your peers.

In a study entitled "Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers" (PDF here), Faria Sana, Tina Weston, and Nichola Cepeda showed eactly that. It is not just that students who "multi-task" during class—check e-mail, text, or whatever—received significantly lower grades in the study than students who did not. This is not surprising, since the human brain simply cannot focus on very many things at one time. (If you're skeptical about this, then watch this video or perhaps some of these ones.) Rather, the surprising conclusion was that students who were sitting near other students who were multi-tasking also received significantly lower grades than students were who not. In fact, they were almost as distracted as the students who were actually doing the multi-tasking!

There is thus evidence that multi-tasking does not only hurt the person doing it. It also harms the people around them. And that is the basis of my request that students not engage in such activities during class. If someone near you is doing so, you should feel free to ask them to stop. If need be, please feel free to talk to me.

Notice Regarding Academic Accommodations and Short-term Adjustments

Brown University is committed to full inclusion of all students. Please inform the instructor early in the term if you have a disability or other condition that might require accommodations or modification of any of the course procedures. For more information, please contact the Office of Student and Employee Accessibility Services. Students in need of short-term academic advice or support can contact one of the deans in the Dean of the College's office.


1 Some of what follows is adapted from syllabus language due to Lynn Hernandez that is cited by the Sheridan Center.

Richard Kimberly Heck Department of Philosophy Brown University